|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Business & Society, Vol. 39, No. 4,
397-418 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/000765030003900404
A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance
Tim Rowley
University of Toronto
Shawn Berman
Boston University
We argue that corporate social performance (CSP) has become a legitimizing identity (brand) for researchers in the business and society field, but it has not developed into a viable theoretical or operational construct. Because measuring CSP is contingent on the operational setting (industry, issues, etc.), it is difficult to produce worthwhile comparisons across studies or generalizing beyond the boundaries of a specific study. The authors suggest that researchers remove the CSP label from their operational variables, and instead narrowly define their studies in operational terms. They provide aworking example of the proposed research direction by examining the theory underlying the popular CSPfinancial performance (FP) debate. In the authors conceptualization, stakeholder action provides the underlying logic connecting CSP-FP, and we recast the research question to investigate the conditions under which stakeholders will take action to influence the focal organization and when those actions will influence the CSP-FP link.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Montiel
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures
Organization Environment,
September 1, 2008;
21(3):
245 - 269.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. G. A. de Bakker and F. den Hond
Introducing the Politics of Stakeholder Influence: A Review Essay
Business Society,
March 1, 2008;
47(1):
8 - 20.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Dentchev
Corporate Social Performance: Business Rationale, Competitiveness Threats, and Management Challenges
Business Society,
March 1, 2007;
46(1):
104 - 116.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Griffin and J. Weber
Industry Social Analysis: Examining the Beer Industry
Business Society,
December 1, 2006;
45(4):
413 - 440.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Hendry
Taking Aim at Business: What Factors Lead Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations to Target Particular Firms?
Business Society,
March 1, 2006;
45(1):
47 - 86.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-M. Meijer and T. Schuyt
Corporate Social Performance as a Bottom Line for Consumers
Business Society,
December 1, 2005;
44(4):
442 - 461.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. G. A. De Bakker, P. Groenewegen, and F. Den Hond
A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance
Business Society,
September 1, 2005;
44(3):
283 - 317.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Seifert, S. A. Morris, and B. R. Bartkus
Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance
Business Society,
June 1, 2004;
43(2):
135 - 161.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Entine
The Myth of Social Investing: A Critique of its Practice and Consequences for Corporate Social Performance Research
Organization Environment,
September 1, 2003;
16(3):
352 - 368.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Hendry
Environmental NGOs and Business: A Grounded Theory of Assessment, Targeting, and Influencing
Business Society,
June 1, 2003;
42(2):
267 - 276.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Calton and S. L. Payne
Coping With Paradox: Multistakeholder Learning Dialogue as a Pluralist Sensemaking Process for Addressing Messy Problems
Business Society,
March 1, 2003;
42(1):
7 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Orlitzky, F. L. Schmidt, and S. L. Rynes
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Organization Studies,
March 1, 2003;
24(3):
403 - 441.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Mahon
Corporate Reputation: Research Agenda Using Strategy and Stakeholder Literature
Business Society,
December 1, 2002;
41(4):
415 - 445.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Griffin
Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century
Business Society,
December 1, 2000;
39(4):
479 - 491.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|