Business & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowley, T.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Business & Society, Vol. 39, No. 4, 397-418 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/000765030003900404

A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance

Tim Rowley

University of Toronto

Shawn Berman

Boston University

We argue that corporate social performance (CSP) has become a legitimizing identity (brand) for researchers in the business and society field, but it has not developed into a viable theoretical or operational construct. Because measuring CSP is contingent on the operational setting (industry, issues, etc.), it is difficult to produce worthwhile comparisons across studies or generalizing beyond the boundaries of a specific study. The authors suggest that researchers remove the CSP label from their operational variables, and instead narrowly define their studies in operational terms. They provide aworking example of the proposed research direction by examining the theory underlying the popular CSP–financial performance (FP) debate. In the authors’ conceptualization, stakeholder action provides the underlying logic connecting CSP-FP, and we recast the research question to investigate the conditions under which stakeholders will take action to influence the focal organization and when those actions will influence the CSP-FP link.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
I. Montiel
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures
Organization Environment, September 1, 2008; 21(3): 245 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
F. G. A. de Bakker and F. den Hond
Introducing the Politics of Stakeholder Influence: A Review Essay
Business Society, March 1, 2008; 47(1): 8 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
N. A. Dentchev
Corporate Social Performance: Business Rationale, Competitiveness Threats, and Management Challenges
Business Society, March 1, 2007; 46(1): 104 - 116.
[PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
J. J. Griffin and J. Weber
Industry Social Analysis: Examining the Beer Industry
Business Society, December 1, 2006; 45(4): 413 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
J. R. Hendry
Taking Aim at Business: What Factors Lead Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations to Target Particular Firms?
Business Society, March 1, 2006; 45(1): 47 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
M.-M. Meijer and T. Schuyt
Corporate Social Performance as a Bottom Line for Consumers
Business Society, December 1, 2005; 44(4): 442 - 461.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
F. G. A. De Bakker, P. Groenewegen, and F. Den Hond
A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance
Business Society, September 1, 2005; 44(3): 283 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
B. Seifert, S. A. Morris, and B. R. Bartkus
Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance
Business Society, June 1, 2004; 43(2): 135 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
J. Entine
The Myth of Social Investing: A Critique of its Practice and Consequences for Corporate Social Performance Research
Organization Environment, September 1, 2003; 16(3): 352 - 368.
[PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
J. R. Hendry
Environmental NGOs and Business: A Grounded Theory of Assessment, Targeting, and Influencing
Business Society, June 1, 2003; 42(2): 267 - 276.
[PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
J. M. Calton and S. L. Payne
Coping With Paradox: Multistakeholder Learning Dialogue as a Pluralist Sensemaking Process for Addressing Messy Problems
Business Society, March 1, 2003; 42(1): 7 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
M. Orlitzky, F. L. Schmidt, and S. L. Rynes
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Organization Studies, March 1, 2003; 24(3): 403 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
J. F. Mahon
Corporate Reputation: Research Agenda Using Strategy and Stakeholder Literature
Business Society, December 1, 2002; 41(4): 415 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
J. J. Griffin
Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century
Business Society, December 1, 2000; 39(4): 479 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]